@LouisIngenthron (all of that said, the actual policy recommendation I typically support is yours! 100x from minimum to maximum. not because i believe that is somehow "right", but because a 100x collar would be a *huge* improvement to the *status quo* without being as disruptive of present arrangements of insisting on a much tighter compression of incomes. whatever ethical case you might make for a tighter compression, getting to 100x would be huge, and we'd know more after getting there.)