from , via slate.com/news-and-politics/20

Text:

From his first day in the Oval Office, Biden has embraced nearly every progressive criticism of Barack Obama's approach to the economy, and translated those critiques into policy. Obama scoffed at labor unions; Biden walked a picket line and appointed the most pro-worker National Labor Relations Board in decades. Obama's Education Department screwed over student debtors; Biden has canceled $138 billion in student debt. Obama defended big business; Biden has been an antitrust warrior. Obama was a free trader, while Biden subsidizes domestic manufacturing. Obama offered to cut Social Security; Biden just torched Republicans during his State of the Union for planning the same thing. Text: From his first day in the Oval Office, Biden has embraced nearly every progressive criticism of Barack Obama's approach to the economy, and translated those critiques into policy. Obama scoffed at labor unions; Biden walked a picket line and appointed the most pro-worker National Labor Relations Board in decades. Obama's Education Department screwed over student debtors; Biden has canceled $138 billion in student debt. Obama defended big business; Biden has been an antitrust warrior. Obama was a free trader, while Biden subsidizes domestic manufacturing. Obama offered to cut Social Security; Biden just torched Republicans during his State of the Union for planning the same thing.

“The problem with social media platforms is not just that they seek to hook us on their products, it’s also that they offer themselves as the answer to profound human desires, which they are ultimately unable to satisfy. We are promised well-being and even joy, but are instead enlisted into a form of life that yields burnout, unhappiness, loneliness, and cynicism.” @lmsacasas theconvivialsociety.substack.c

“if corrupt acts help me, then obviously at least this kind of corruption serves the cause of meritocracy.”

"As with Boeing in the late 1990s, Apple is financializing; it now spends twice as much on stock buybacks as it does on R&D, and that’s because it faces no meaningful competition that forces it to innovate. For sure, Apple has fantastic development capacity, as illustrated by the Vision Pro, but it increasingly degrades the quality of its own flagship product - the iPhone - for the purpose of maintaining its market power." @matthewstoller thebignewsletter.com/p/why-the

via the same @matthewstoller piece, from the DoJ complaint (I think), a good explanation of the kind of thinking that leaves Apple Mail languishing in sucktitude despite the trivial amount of investment it would take to maintain it as a great mail client.

thebignewsletter.com/p/why-the

in reply to self
Text:

For example, Apple's vice president of iPhone marketing explained in February 2020: Text: For example, Apple's vice president of iPhone marketing explained in February 2020: "In looking at it with hindsight, | think going forward we need to set a stake in the ground for what features we think are ‘good enough’ for the consumer. | would argue were [sic] already doing *more* than what would have been good enough.” After identifying old features that “would have been good enough today if we hadn't introduced [updated features] already,” she explained, "anything new and especially expensive needs to be rigorously challenged before it's allowed into the consumer phone.”

if you are interested in tech things, and don’t follow @llimllib’s remarkably useful and interesting and concise notes, you are missing out. an amazing resource. notes.billmill.org/

“The problem with the requirement for each year to be more profitable than the last is that once you reach the peak, once it's not possible to actually improve your product any more, you still have to change something. Since you can't change it to make it better, you therefore will change it to make it worse.” @andrewrk andrewkelley.me/post/why-we-ca ht @llimllib

// i’m reluctant to drive any car manufactured later than 2015, since they’ve all been made worse, at least from a privacy perspective

“For many decades, American Jews have built our political identity on a contradiction: Pursue equal citizenship here; defend group supremacy there. Now here and there are converging. In the years to come, we will have to choose.” @PeterBeinart nytimes.com/2024/03/22/opinion

“Bruce Schneier has a name for this practice: ‘feudal security.’ That's when you cede control over your device to a Big Tech warlord whose ‘walled garden’ becomes a fortress that defends you against external threats… The keyword here is external threats. When Apple itself threatens your privacy, the fortress becomes a prison.” @pluralistic pluralistic.net/2024/03/22/rea ht @chasedmartin

is it too gross a kind of self-promotion to boost when people link to your shit?

I really enjoyed this mini memoir of @rbreich's friendship and dialog with the inimitable JK Galbraith. robertreich.substack.com/p/my-

sometimes i pace my apartment searching for my glasses because they're so closely bound to my face i can't see where they are.

when it disputes your priors, you dismiss it as a corrupt shitlib rag.

when it reinforces your priors, you take it as evidence, "even the liberal xxx admits that..."

@Cyrus @xerophile don’t give them any idea$, please!

everything we do we all do together.

this has implications for your innocence.

it’s important we elect only superficial people to positions of political authority. we wouldn’t want anyone who understands how intolerable the human condition is to have access to the nuclear codes.

i want a button that says “maybe never”.

[New Post] February interfluidity.com/v2/9949.html

now products have dual loyalty.

[New Post] February interfluidity.com/v2/9949.html

i've added an option to e-mail subscribe to all my crap as one weekly digest.

my testing skillz are so awesome we'll have to wait a few days to be sure it actually maybe works though...

drafts.interfluidity.com/subsc