@volkris @Hyolobrika @AltonDooley

No. Courts must always throw out cases that are on their face "invalid (malicious or otherwise faulty)". The problem is, when a lawsuit or prosecution occurs, there is often a dispute over whether a suit is "invalid (malicious or otherwise faulty)". 1/

in reply to @volkris

@volkris @Hyolobrika @AltonDooley Courts then must inquire into the dispute as a factual matter.

Immunity is quite distinct.

"The essence of immunity 'is its possessor’s entitlement
not to have to answer for his conduct' in court."

That's John Roberts, from the decision. That is quite distinct from saying Courts must examine a prosecution in any way at all, and dismiss the bad ones. It says Courts have no business examining or evaluating an allegation at all. That is what immunity means. /fin

in reply to self