@Hyolobrika @dushman It’s not typically what “socialism” is defined as. Socialism is typically defined as a system in which the means of production are collectively or state owned. The collective is a much broader category than “workers” in any society. 1/

in reply to this

@Hyolobrika @dushman Typically ~50% of humans do not work, because they are children, informal carers, retired, or disabled. I think, under contemporary states, we’d all object to a system that restricted the franchise only to those formally employed. 2/

in reply to self

@Hyolobrika “Syndicalism” is the closest word I know to this system that you and @dushman are describing. /fin

in reply to self

@Hyolobrika p.s. @dushman is your name taken from the Romanian duşman?

in reply to self