“alkaline bitch” just doesn’t have the same ring.

when you die they finally let you in on the joke.

"The hopeful news is that there has been something of a return to genuine mass membership groups, promoted by a new wave of on-the-ground organizing." prospect.org/power/2024-07-30-

// you are not going to build a world better for all on a foundation of charity from the very rich

perhaps, at least for one political party, it should be called the creepstakes.

CapitalistsToday.com

Screenshot of spam e-mail:

Collect Government Checks 

CAPITALISTS TODAY

Information provided by CapitalistsToday.com is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice.

This offer is brought to you by Capitalists Today. 221 W gth St # Wilmington, DE, 19801, USA. If you would like to unsubscribe from receiving offers brought to you by Capitalists Today click here. Screenshot of spam e-mail: Collect Government Checks CAPITALISTS TODAY Information provided by CapitalistsToday.com is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. This offer is brought to you by Capitalists Today. 221 W gth St # Wilmington, DE, 19801, USA. If you would like to unsubscribe from receiving offers brought to you by Capitalists Today click here.

@FeralRobots Gack! I think the longest tenured are Thomas and Roberts. Sorry!

in reply to @FeralRobots

@FeralRobots under that theory, then, Roberts and Alito might be immediately retired, since they’d be the most past-due, and that would be consistent with the two-appointments per Presidential term norm they’d be trying to enshrine.

i wonder if unexpected vacancies would then remain vacant until a new term, to prioritize appointments fairness? a tie-susceptible court is an annoyance, but one we’ve dealt with fine from time to time.

in reply to @FeralRobots

Would the term-limit proposal in Biden’s three-part Supreme Court reform plan immediately retire Roberts, Thomas, and Alito (assuming passage in 2025)? How would those vacancies be filled?

describes working for in a piece by @ddayen prospect.org/politics/2024-07-

there’s no shame in feeling ashamed.

i’d much rather get on a “social democrats for kamala” call than a “white dudes for kamala” call, even though i am both.

Please rate the cleanliness of this post.

57.1%
🙂
(12 votes)
23.8%
😐
(5 votes)
19.0%
🙁
(4 votes)

@admitsWrongIfProven ?

@djc no, it’s not. it’s funny, sometimes hilarious, but i can’t condone character assassination based on a lie. not that the internet cares what i condone.

i think it’s weird to call childless liberal professional women cat ladies, or imagine we live in a Victorian novel and they’re spinsters. It’s very weird to talk about Soros chartering 747s for disproportionately black women who choose not to carry a pregnancy to term, and suggesting Federal policy should intervene to prevent.

in reply to @djc

@djc no, i don’t think that’s quite fair.

in reply to @djc

they are weird. and not, like, keep-Austin-weird weird.

is Ohio the new Florida? Ohio Man riseth.

from @ddayen prospect.org/power/2024-07-26-

Text:

Over the past four years, the fight against corporate power has been embedded into the architecture of Democratic policy. The people pumping out the headlines that benefit the American people are all part of that architecture. The president whom Kamala Harris spends half her stump speech praising ushered in that architecture and fully supports it. The vision of America that Harris sketches out in those speeches-lower costs, better opportunity, a middle class that isn't squeezed but can get ahead-is inseparable from that architecture. Is Harris really going to betray this vision because of one lousy donor? Text: Over the past four years, the fight against corporate power has been embedded into the architecture of Democratic policy. The people pumping out the headlines that benefit the American people are all part of that architecture. The president whom Kamala Harris spends half her stump speech praising ushered in that architecture and fully supports it. The vision of America that Harris sketches out in those speeches-lower costs, better opportunity, a middle class that isn't squeezed but can get ahead-is inseparable from that architecture. Is Harris really going to betray this vision because of one lousy donor?

My felafel joint would be called “Felafely”.

they were so into catgirl. who did they think she would grow into?