@Extra_Special_Carbon i’m not disagreeing!

@Extra_Special_Carbon for reasons good or bad, there has been a lot of… discussion.

an admirably candid, but miserable and unwise, theory of democracy from dropsitenews.com/p/biden-is-ou

Text:

If the various candidates
and their allies are on TV regularly and giving
speeches on their behalf, with regular
breaking-news around endorsements from
big-wigs, unions, environmental groups, etc.,
it will feel like what we understand today as
authentically real and democratic: reality TV. Text: If the various candidates and their allies are on TV regularly and giving speeches on their behalf, with regular breaking-news around endorsements from big-wigs, unions, environmental groups, etc., it will feel like what we understand today as authentically real and democratic: reality TV.

@dpp i promise not to hold them for ransom!

in reply to @dpp

mstdn.social/@MatthewChat/1128

The next debate is gonna be lit.

Biden’s formal announcement was less explicit, but via “socials” he is plainly endorsing as his successor. x.com/joebiden/status/18150877

I am delighted to support her.

@realcaseyrollins it did. he’s dropped out.

in reply to this

I want to take a moment just to thank Joe Biden.

I did not want him to win the 2020 Democratic primary. I disliked him for much about his long career as Senator and Vice President.

But he governed as the best domestic policy President of my lifetime, by far.

I hope that whoever is next continues and expands that good work.

@nocontext same text (truncated somewhere within the tags section) as a prompt to Bing Image Creator bing.com/images/create/1965-of

in reply to @nocontext

first they came for the gang members, or for anyone who looked like gang members, and that actually seemed like a good idea. then they came for the price gougers, and, well, okay. but then they came for… apnews.com/article/bukele-salv ht

yeah. you see, it’s all about “little tech”. that’s what they are for. free enterprise. they want to reign in big tech at least as much as the other guys. x.com/_richardhall/status/1814

there’s no one less trustworthy than an anonymous insider.

“The broligarchs have made their move – and the rest of us need to understand exactly what that means.” theguardian.com/us-news/articl

“I am not a tech genius but it does seem like being able to update every single computer globally simultaneously is its own security flaw.” @Atrios eschatonblog.com/2024/07/seems

This post falls short of our editorial standards.

hell is misepistemology.

Donald Trump is what the singularity looks like. nytimes.com/2024/07/19/opinion

[new draft post] Trump v. United States: Greatest Hits drafts.interfluidity.com/2024/

There's a version of "institutionalist" that is not remotely interested in defending anything about the substantive character of our institutions, but which simply triangulates itself, always, to the center of whatever the institutions of the moment happen to be, whether they are wonderful or abhorrent, no matter how they come to evolve, or to devolve.