"campaigns are not where realignments happen, they are only where promises are made." #MatthewStoller writes on JD Vance https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/can-jd-vances-populist-crusade-succeed ht @DetroitDan
"For of all the reasons Donald Trump chose J.D. Vance to be his running mate, the one that stands out the clearest is this: Vance came complete with the biggest dowry in human history." #HaroldMeyerson https://prospect.org/politics/2024-07-18-would-jd-vance-join-uaw-picket-line-tesla/
one way to understand this moment is that the golden age of television — with its antiheroes and garish plot twists — has finally caught up with US electoral campaigns, replacing past decades’ formulaic procedurals.
unfortunately, at least so far, the better the television, the worse the consequences of the politics.
I think this article is unpersuasive, because it worries about what intelligence agencies will do with commercially available data and asks we restrain them, without discussing what private actors might do with the same data, and how we restrain them.
I certainly want the US intelligence community to be able to do anything Elon Musk is able to do. I distrust both, but I distrust Musk and his fellow plutocrats more. ht @Geoffberner https://newsie.social/@freedomofpress/112808439487349216
@isomorphismes yes. it’s a small world after all, when a giant like the United States bestrides it.
only god knows what these fuckers are going to do next.
"Against choosing your political allegiances based on who is 'pro-crypto'" @vbuterin https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2024/07/17/procrypto.html
"Wisdom and intelligence have shockingly little to do with one another. Sometimes, I think they might be inversely correlated." #quoderat http://www.technologyasnature.com/core-issue/
@farah i sometimes regret i lack the technical skill to bury my head in the sand.
from #PaulStarr https://prospect.org/justice/2024-07-17-supreme-courts-license-presidential-vengeance/
The New York Times (which I think it is fair to describe as very activist on this issue) describes the Biden Administration's (non)reaction to Biden's apparent unpopularity and concerns surrounding his age as Joe Biden putting "Self over party".
Do you think that characterization accurate, that the determining factor in administration strategy is the career- or self-interest of Biden and/or his staff and advisors?
Or do you think it inaccurate, and broader concerns are governing their choices?
This Supreme Court is undermining the administrative state so that labor conditions everywhere can be like those in Oklahoma marijuana farms.
from #SebastianRotella @kirstenberg https://www.propublica.org/article/marijuana-oklahoma-china-immigration-safety-workers ht @ZhiZhu
on the bright side, the opportunity cost of welcoming their hatred has grown small. https://mastodon.social/@dangillmor/112801694378200717
they call news what so often is just noise.
"look, October surprises are part of American democracy, and whether you think Hunter Biden is as major an issue as I do or disagree, in American democracy you let the voters decide." #JDVance https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/13/opinion/jd-vance-interview.html
// if "October surprises" are part of American democracy, i think they are a part we should work assiduously to reform away. i don't see how arranging transient changes in voter sentiment strategically just before elections contributes to deliberation or legitimacy.
@admitsWrongIfProven i don’t see a lot of hope or virtue in plutocratic charity.
“I can imagine being powerful without losing my sense of what's right. I think that many well-meaning folks, technologists or otherwise, feel that way. But that is precisely the mistake: power does not corrupt moral fibre, power corrupts intelligence. The greater the power differential the lesser the access one has to others' realities. The more powerful you are the harder it is for feedback to reach you and force you to adjust, whether you seek it or not.” @robin https://berjon.com/ethicswishing/
@Arianity (i thought the content of the speech was very, very good, beyond the throat-clearing and Trump flattery to justify the fact of the speech itself.)
Elon Musk has promised to donate $45 million per month to a pro-Trump super-PAC. He is also working to have the Supreme Coup declare the NLRB unconstitutional. https://onlabor.org/tracking-attacks-on-the-nlrb-spacex-tries-its-luck-again/
Meanwhile, Teamsters President Sean O’Brien gives a barnburner of a speech at the Republican National Convention, extolling in sometimes very personal terms the necessity and value of labor unions, skewering tech firms including Amazon, Uber, and Lyft. (But no Musk firm was directly named.)
Weird times.