@GuerillaOntologist reading the full piece, it doesn’t sound like they are all that much reformed.
@_dm gonna die with my keyboard in my hand *lawd lawd*
gonna die with my keyboard in my hand.
@simontatham the mode tells you which value has the most entries in your data. the commode is where most datasets belong.
@simontatham oh! with apologies to @CliftonR!
the korean war reanimates as proxy war in ukraine. https://koreapro.org/2024/10/south-korea-announces-potential-weapons-provision-for-ukraine/
when throwing one scapegoat off the cliff doesn’t resolve the problem, well you need to find another scapegoat to throw off the cliff for that!
@curtosis i’ve really only ever been able to muster dipshit, in almost any activity i’ve tried…
@Transportist I think @mhs’s use of “inflection point” was right. It’s not that the anti-hero was unknown prior to 24. But it accelerated, became kind of the norm, during the edgy “golden age of television”.
(The Soprano’s also, also a bit earlier, I think. In general, maybe mafia tales were kind of a ghetto of popular anti-heroism before 9/11.)
A very good interview by #LexFridman of #BernieSanders, a guy who through all the twists and turns has retained my admiration.
It's also quite remarkable how quick and on-point he remains, compared to his contemporaries, Joe Biden, Donald Trump.
@mhs Yes! That was the show that really broke ground, in a bad way. We knew it at the time, talked about it, watched it.
Culturally, we’ve grown accustomed to rooting for anti-heroes. I wonder if that hasn’t primed us to be able to vote for someone like Donald Trump, in full(ish) knowledge of who he is.
Are we just collectively Breaking Bad?
from #HamiltonNolan https://inthesetimes.com/article/union-election-trump-harris-2024-labor-pro-act-election ht #ErikLoomis

Ads for candidates I support don’t motivate me. I resent the manipulation. I feel like they cheapen causes that matter to me, and turn them into grifts.
But ads by their opponents—the shamelessness and dissembling—infuriate me. The other guy going negative is, for me, the most effective positive.
it’s weird that in development and geopolitics there’s a sense in which the opposite of West is South.
@scott i don’t think we can know anything. everything we learn before the election is not offered to provide predictively meaningful information, but tailored towards neutralizing threats to her election.
once elected, everything changes, the only things that really bind—even these only to a very limited degree—are promises made directly by the candidate (not by her “surrogates”).
@scott the entire Harris administration is an echo of Nancy Pelosi’s line on the ACA: “We have to pass the bill [elect the lady] so that you can find out what’s in it [what she really means to do].”
i’m hoping for a sharp turn on Israel policy. i have no idea how likely that is, especially since i think Netanyahu may well drag our military into active combat before she gets her chance.
@scott 😊
but i think they’re better off with the line-up they’ve got.
i can be an enthusiastic side dipshit! join me!
speaking personally, i think it’s perfectly acceptable to jump around and skip like a dipshit. i encourage it even.
what is not acceptable is buying an election for a fascist.
Science famously progresses “one funeral at a time” (Max Planck). And so it was with moving past the NAIRU paradigm at the Fed, only a bit less morbidly.
See this excellent column by @jwmason https://jwmason.org/slackwire/does-the-fed-still-believe-in-the-nairu/
Tax cuts “are the political equivalent of someone chopping your house to pieces with an axe and then offering the remains back to you under a sign that says, ‘Free Firewood!’” #HamiltonNolan https://www.hamiltonnolan.com/p/why-republicans-love-to-offer-you