the vivaldi browser has a built-in RSS reader. cf openrss.org/blog/vivaldi-web-b

the very purpose of a state
is to integrate.

if it is true there is power in a name, penicillin is like the opposite of bushes.

oh my god this is the most nonsequitur of my autocomplete mishaps ever. (really ios slide typing mishap rather than autocomplete.)

in reply to self

[tech notebook] Condensing updates that appear in digests tech.interfluidity.com/2024/06

"When you rely…on social media algorithms to determine what appears in your feed, you are giving up control and relinquishing your attention to platforms designed to monopolize as much of your time and consciousness as they can get away with. RSS readers put you in the driver's seat. You decide [what is] worth your time and attention… rather than having it pushed on you based on what some company has determined is likely to keep you scrolling." @Daojoan joanwestenberg.com/rss-the-for ht @kstewart

"If you have two segments of the economy with different approaches, and one of them has a higher exponential growth rate then in the long run it will come to dominate, even if it starts out as a very small enclave… if you want to transition from a dominant, fast-growing economic model to something else, you either need that something else to grow even faster, or you need to kneecap the dominant, fast-growing segment." @ZaneSelvans amateurearthling.org/2023/11/0

@steve_zeke there's a lot of amazing stuff!

in reply to @steve_zeke

@chrisp @SteveRoth You won't be too surprised I disagree with Paul Graham, and agree with you.

Income dispersion enhances incentives to produce and innovate. It also enhances incentive to prey, extract, and game. As usual when there are tradeoffs, the "optimum" is likely an interior solution. It is possible to have too little and possible to have too much variation of income. 1/

in reply to @chrisp

@chrisp @SteveRoth "'Incentives to produce' are incentives to rig the game" interfluidity.com/v2/5031.html 2/

in reply to self

@chrisp @SteveRoth "Dispersion causes discohesion" interfluidity.com/v2/7629.html /fin

// sorry for always pushing my shit!

in reply to self

Link.

For free.

Your actually linking stuff is our only refuge from corporate-controlled algorithms and paid influencers.

The more humans link to work they think excellent or important, the less our thinking, our very being, becomes collectively subject to the small fraction and faction that holds nearly all the purse strings.

Link.

Joyfully. Promiscuously. But with curation, discrimination.

Link.

"the globalized system in which state planning is outsourced to private consultancies, and with time even the supervision of the consultants is outsourced to consultants, is an Anglosphere special, dating from the 1990s onward… It’s turned entire countries, like the United Kingdom, incapable of building more than about one line per generation." @Alon pedestrianobservations.com/202

i think we should poll the electorate on their view of politicians who carefully hew to poll numbers when crafting messaging to the public.

@realcaseyrollins this is just a thought experiment, not a proposal. but resilient, credible randomness turns out to be surprisingly doable. you can mix multiple sources such that if any one source is not corrupt, the outcome is truly random even if all other sources are corrupt.

in reply to this

@inkican it’s a thought experiment, not advocacy. the subject of the experiment is the voting public, not the winner.

in reply to @inkican

@LouisIngenthron only if the slot won.

in reply to @LouisIngenthron

@LouisIngenthron (obviously you’d need a credible, incorruptible, source of randomness, but that turns out to be a surprisingly tractable problem)

in reply to self

@kestral it’s made of people.

in reply to @kestral

what if as a third party candidate we had “randomly selected eligible citizen” on the ballot?

would that beat RFK Jr etc? from which major party candidate would it pull more? might it win?

“This has been a key part of China’s success with building large-scale infrastructure. Multiple competent, well-resourced construction firms compete for contracts. If there are any issues, contractors can be swapped out relatively easily. And the parent SOEs help to maintain this balanced set of competitors, making sure that no single subsidiary gets too weak or too dominant.” high-capacity.com/p/managed-co

@luis_in_brief @delong i devoted a couple of years to that stuff. interfluidity.com/v2/7153.html

in reply to @luis_in_brief

captures what makes me sad about the state of crypto. bloomberg.com/news/newsletters ht @delong

“If they were stand-alone companies, the three biggest P.B.M.s would each rank among the top 40 U.S. companies by revenue. The largest, Caremark, generates more revenue than Ford or Home Depot.” nytimes.com/2024/06/21/busines

// PBMs are a reaction to the monopoly power of drug companies, theoretically serve kind of as unions of drug buyers to exert bargaining power + secure lower prices. but they are not unions, they are for-profit firms. they collude not to trim the fat but to increase and share it.