@farah who?

often the best way to get it right is to get it wrong and then fix it.

It's good they specifically added a Reply-To header.

"if it's gonna end in tears, it might as well begin in laughter."

(from a board meeting of https://d24n.org/, including @chrisp et al.)

i don’t know whether the deadline is a week from now or not, but i think people are underestimating the catastrophe, both in terms of a longer-term international order and shorter term domestic politics, an abandonment of Ukraine would be.

@selmins i’m grateful!

for me it’s maybe a bit pathetic at this point. https://youtu.be/6vQpW9XRiyM

your kindness is a crime. it will only encourage them.

“There's an interesting recent development in the world of feeds and blogs -- blogs that are only feeds.” @davew http://scripting.com/2023/12/11.html#a133756

// podcasts have basically been this for a long time. i increasingly think it’s the right model. humans generate items (articles, podcasts, artwork, video, comments and remarks). the most basic form into which they are organized are feeds, which a variety of tools and applications both render for them and enable them to author into

is the prayer “may god’s will be done” tautological or essential?

if, granted a single wish by a genie, yours was “may god’s will be done”, would anything change?

“[I]t is likely that lowering drug prices will actually result in better health outcomes. If there is no one who has a major incentive to mislead the public about the safety and effectiveness of a drug, we are more likely to get accurate information about the usefulness of different drugs for treating various conditions.” @DeanBaker13 on a Biden administration proposal to use a provision of the Bayh-Dole Act to limit prices of drugs derived from government-funded research https://cepr.net/bidens-move-on-bayh-dole-important-first-step-in-dealing-with-patent-monopolies-and-high-prices/

@ZaneSelvans that's the bad part.

history is best made gradually.

"Sinwar" is one of those names too on the nose.

@KevinMarks @davew mb we shld think abt a more bidirectional relationship than conventional search. writers opt-in, with some responsible identity. then fediverse-style moderation obtains. a union of opted-in sites is collected by something like a common crawl, which might pick-up spam, but restricts to material plausibly moderate-length articles of text. (obviously some devils in those details.) gateway sites superimpose blocklists and algorithms. universe is small enough for multiple gateways.

"If we want independent writing on the web to flourish, we need our own search engine, to help us find each other" @davew http://scripting.com/2023/12/11/141811.html?title=workingTogetherForWriters

@sqrtminusone if you run a forum, maybe you can argue you’re not responsible for what others post. but you are certainly responsible for decisions that the algorithm you write and deploy makes on your behalf. however their algorithm is written (and we know it’s not “pure”, it for example elevates elon’s speech), its choices and their downstream effects are xitter’s responsibility, morally if not legally.

it's not an endorsement, it's just a free-speech thing, right?

#MattYglesias makes an interesting point.

In the past, a two-state solution in Israel was undercut by Israeli security fears about a hostile, very intimate neighbor. But now, Yglesias argues, Israel and its Arab neighbors share a joint security interest in deterring Iran, but the Palestinian problem prevents full alliance and cooperation that would improve their mutual security. So security risks of a Palestinian state must be balanced against security benefits.

https://www.slowboring.com/p/the-two-state-solution-is-still-best

@GuerillaOntologist i like how “auto” is a pun / double entendre in this context.

our AI autocomplete will observe our corrections until eventually we see no need to correct and it simply interacts in our stead. then our mortal coils can simply fall away while no one, least of all ourselves, even notices.