@jwz Unlike Google, XScreenSaver will never charge you money for fraudulent clicks on domain parks that it characterizes to advertisers as "search engines"

in reply to @jwz

[New Post] May away interfluidity.com/v2/10003.htm

@paninid i'm very curious what the price of a gallon will be this November.

in reply to @paninid

does the public even care?

markets civilize greed, but states civilize markets.

"Techno-optimists place their faith in innovation; degrowthers place theirs in social movements. Both sides lay claim to being the genuine realists. Each insists that we simply don’t have enough time to do what the other side wants."

from an excellent discussion of degrowth and its discontents by nytimes.com/2024/06/08/books/r

@djc (that does describe the vast, vast majority of twitter users, including the vast majority of the people i used to interact with frequently there. you, my friend, are the rare, noble, exception.)

in reply to @djc

A tale of two polls.

First, on Mastodon. Second, on xitter. My idiosyncratic catchments in both applications.

Same question:

Overall, the United States __________ to COVID between March 2020 and July 2021.

On Mastodon, 2% choose "overreacted", 81% choose "underreacted", 17% choose "responded about right"

On xitter, 22.5% choose "overreacted", 40.6% choose "underreacted", 36.9% choose "responded about right"

Screenshot of completed Mastodon poll:

Overall, the United States __________ to COVID between March 2020 and July 2021.

2% choose Screenshot of completed Mastodon poll: Overall, the United States __________ to COVID between March 2020 and July 2021. 2% choose "overreacted", 81% choose "underreacted", 17% choose "responded about right"
Screenshot of completed Xitter poll:

Overall, the United States __________ to COVID between March 2020 and July 2021.

22.5% choose Screenshot of completed Xitter poll: Overall, the United States __________ to COVID between March 2020 and July 2021. 22.5% choose "overreacted", 40.6% choose "underreacted", 36.9% choose "responded about right"

in my timeline the search engines are called “bong” and “giggle”.

"Capitalism exacerbates 'greed' via assembling increasing marginal utility agents from decreasing ones" concretepossibleworld.substack

@Flux @jcriecke very few other jurisdictions offer a liability shield with anywhere near the breadth of US CDA Section 230, yet Mastodon thrives. it will continue to thrive in the US as well, if, for example the US were to replace Section 230 with, say, rules that attach liability upon notice, after a grace period, as in the UK. repealing or reforming the US’ extraordinarily broad shield does not imply imposition of some kind of hair-trigger strict liability.

in reply to @Flux

@jcriecke @Flux are there no or few Mastodon servers outside of the United States? in many jurisdictions without US Section 230 protection, my impression is Mastodon thrives.

in reply to @jcriecke

so after i post some stuff, i sometimes ego search a bit, put my name in various search engines restricting to the past week in desperate hunger for feedback.

i have to admit my search of kagi.com tonight was a bit depressing!

screenshot of kagi.com search box showing suggested completions for screenshot of kagi.com search box showing suggested completions for "steve randy waldman" (my pen name). the first suggestion is "steve randy waldma obituary"

[new draft post] Only the state can house us drafts.interfluidity.com/2024/

“The very fact that people want to buy their way out of all of these experiences points to the reason why they shouldn’t be able to.” hamiltonnolan.com/p/everyone-i ht @andrewducker

@marick kind of a rough tale!

in reply to @marick

@akkartik @llimllib thanks! since updates are what i'm obsessing over these days, i've added an update… tech.interfluidity.com/2024/06

in reply to @akkartik

@Transportist worse. there’s no pod to escape from.

in reply to @Transportist

@TodePond @alex @akkartik @llimllib let's!

in reply to @TodePond

@caseyjennings i think tons and tons, the vast majority, near the top. but retained earnings are genuinely less "income" than realized payouts, as they remain under contestation within the firm. however, the "tax efficiency" of buybacks is a huge source of evasion, allowing for carefully timed and distributed tax-minimized payouts. we should ban the practice in part because it is efficient in precisely the way its proponents argue.

in reply to @caseyjennings